Though common sense and copyright law should be enough, I guess I have to say it: All Rights Reserved on all written material at http://juliedemboski.wordpress.com http://askjulie.wordpress.com and http://dogandsunflower.wordpress.com and on any illustrations by me. No Creative Commons Licenses have been granted for any of my sites. Contact me directly at firstname.lastname@example.org for any and all permissions; brief excerpts of a single paragraph or less with live link specifically within a post, article, or forum are allowed without permission (in fact, I thank you for thinking enough of what I say to quote me!)–
‘Born Today’ is the exception–please feel free to share it, with attribution or link back–share buttons appear when you click on the individual post.
Everything else, and inclusion in all other published forms, please ask. Presenting the title of my post and portions of it, and/ or my name as a way to drive traffic to your unrelated site are specifically prohibited, as is posting material of more than a single paragraph in any forum.
In an age where access to and easy duplication of others’ material is at our fingertips, there needs to be a firm recognition that intellectual property is no different than material property. The misunderstanding is not about attribution (though that’s certainly important) or whether the person taking the material is profiting, but about what copyright really means: that the creator or other rights holder retains control over the subject material. It is the copyright holder’s prerogative to decide where and how his or her creation is used, not the right of even the most well-meaning reader or enthusiast. The argument is made that this is free positive pr, that traffic is driven to the individual’s site, and that the internet is meant to be a free-for-all in terms of information sharing. To the first two points I must answer that these instances result in very little traffic or positive feedback/ new clients or sales–typically viewing from a forum or website posting amounts to far less than 1% of the traffic for the day–and I’m not looking for publicity, though I can’t speak for others on this point. As to the internet being a no-barriers no ownership of material place, this attitude exists only in persons who lack a grasp of the need to protect the creative rights of artists/ creators of all kinds so that they can not only control their creations but profit from them, and thereby be enabled to continue to produce. I believe it should be my choice when and how my work is offered to others.
I find it discouraging to have to address this issue; lovely individuals who wouldn’t think of stealing something from a retail store happily steal from a website. Please think carefully before taking any material from anyone without permission, and have a firm understanding of the concepts of intellectual property ownership before using others’ material.