Tags
Astrology of Weddings, Chiron, Dana Gerhardt, David Letterman, Finger of God, Jude Cowell, Moon, Moon bombing and NASA, Obama Nobel Prize
I think these two events, the announcement of an extortion attempt revolving around talk show host David Letterman’s office affairs with staff members, and the bombing of our satellite Moon seeking evidence of water by NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration), are in a sense, one and the same, or at least, two reflections of a similar dynamic involving Chiron. Can we call this a ‘hurt to heal’ manifestation of the energies? Maybe, as in Letterman’s case his willingness to speak openly of his involvements took the power away from the extortionist, and though it certainly was hurtful to his new wife, Regina Lasko (but please, she met him while working on the show, over 20 years ago–doesn’t that suggest she knows precisely what kind of environment exists behind the scenes at ‘Late Night’?) it also meant that no one could threaten to ‘out’ Letterman–and for all we know, Lasko may have known about the affairs, and made her own peace with it.
When, on his show, Letterman detailed the threats he’d received, an astute reader asked me if the marriage of Letterman and Lasko hadn’t occurred under some less-than-optimal conditions–and indeed it had. Letterman’s public confession came with a Finger of God formed by transiting energies Mercury and Mars, with apex Chiron–surely an appropriate description of the admission, a kind of ‘Rip the band-aid off quickly’ method of dealing with hurt involving communicating and taking action.
The marriage chart for Lasko and Letterman (19 March 2009 3:00 PM in Choteau, Montana, per Letterman’s own announcement on his show) illustrates that tension may be an ongoing theme, as well as difficulty of the two parties successfully connecting. The Moon (bride) and the Sun (groom) form no aspect at the time of the wedding, but will connect by Solar Arc eventually in sextile–not promising. Juno is also exactly conjunct Chiron, cluing us in to the likely response to a threat of hurt (personal empowerment, taking control of the threat to partnership). The Sun itself is at 29 degrees Pisces, promising unrelenting tension, and Venus (the woman) and Mars (the man) make no contact but will eventually semi-sextile by Solar Arc–again, weak, and add to this Venus in Retrograde–oy! Nothing of a contract or relationship nature should be finalized during Venus’ retreat–we are just too unsteady in identifying our values and what matters to us, if nothing else. And we look at the significators for the Ascendant and Descendant, which also stand-in for bride and groom (designation depends on the personal charts of the individuals, though sometimes it’s obviously related to one or the other), and we see that the Sun and Uranus are past conjunction, perhaps suggesting that the relationship, too, is past its prime contact point (in this case that works out by Solar Arc measurement to have been the conception of son Harry. Sorry, I couldn’t get the chart to reproduce in a readable form–will keep working on it.
Does the wedding chart imply the relationship is doomed? Though I haven’t studied it closely, I think the answer is ‘no,’ as my impression is more along the lines of it being an arrangement–not without genuine feeling, but also missing the compelling spark between two individuals that we typically believe drives marriage today. Perhaps it’s a more practical relationship than we would like to imagine for people who choose to stay together and create a family–romanticism can lead us to over-value sex, magnetism, and one-and-only love while undervaluing companionship and a shared goal (in this case, the raising of their child).
Now what does this have to do with NASA crashing two bodies into the Moon? When it happened, about 4:30 AM 9 October (Pacific coast), the Moon was making a a trine to Chiron. An astute Twitter friend asked me what I thought the bombing signified–and I answered that it was in some way a Collective wound that we must look for the counterpart to in our own lives–but it also may in my opinion signify the kind of insult we’ve been suffering as a Collective for some time, as those who have the power act ‘in our name’ in ways that are pointlessly destructive–am I saying the bombing of the Moon is pointless? I’m not venturing an opinion one way or the other about the validity of the action, since I’m not a scientist privy to the thought process behind this choice–I’m simply saying that, coming right now, this seems to symbolize emotionally destructive actions on a mass scale–an undermining, perhaps, and it’s so interesting that they used a Centaur rocket! I think we meet it best by acknowledging the active Chiron in our own lives–how we may be hurt and hurting others–and the example of David Letterman’s public honesty, no matter what you think of the actions that led to the need for his confession, is a good attitude for us all to take–responsibility, openness, and the courage to own up to who and what we are.
I don’t know what the Moon bombing might stand for, though I was tempted to link it to Obama’s win of the Nobel for Peace. It seems to me a kind of wounding disservice to award someone something before he’s been able to implement so many of his ideas, a way to at once hamstring him (will he be able to send troops where he feels he needs to with the mantel of ‘Peacemaker’ on him?) and to somehow take the glory from the prize–the earning of it, through accomplishment, is where the prestige has always been–and though it was no small feat for an African-American to win the office of President, we need to let him show his stuff–not be in such a hurry to applaud him or condemn him that we don’t listen to his points, support his efforts at reform, and allow him to develop a foreign policy true to what he feels we need–rather than allow this blunting of his reach, by having Europe tell him, ‘You’re the bringer of Peace, now go sit in the corner.” Catch Jude Cowell’s excellent analysis here http://starsoverwashington.blogspot.com/2009/10/obamas-potential-peaciness-to-be.html and here by Dana Gerhardt http://mooncircles.com/blog/2009/10/obamas-peace-prize/
See the latest ‘What You’re Asking’ http://askjulie.wordpress.com/2009/10/10/what-youre-asking-asteroids-and-social-skills/
Interesting insights, Julie! Thanks!
Re: the Nobel Peace prize & Obama, people want a grand gesture, or a solid moment that somehow proves “peace.”
Yet, peace is gained one person at a time, one moment at a time and one decision at a time. If one person can inspire millions to check their motives and actions before they get out of control, why not recognize that? Yes, it’s more subtle than what we’re used to. But valid, nonetheless. It’s been a long time since anyone has captured the hearts of so many in such a positive way.
Thanks, April, and I agree, but it would be naive to think that everyone views Obama’s influence in this way–something we must keep in mind.
LikeLike
Hi, jd. Thanks for this. I like the Chiron and Moon bombing reading in particular. It’s interesting how many of the news reports of the event said it made for bad TV – i.e. nothing happened on screen. I wonder if someone at NASA bizarrely thought that it would somehow replicate the euphoria of the moon landing. Only with Bizarro fashion.
The Obama Peace Prize also strikes me as a Bizarro announcement; Alice’s Looking-Glass World where things work backwards. My feeling when I first heard about it was that this continues to play out the PTSD of the Bush years. I think Americans (generally speaking) tend to underestimate the utter RELIEF the rest of the world felt when Obama was elected.
Hi hitch, and thanks! Good point about someone at NASA perhaps thinking this would be a moment of triumph–I hadn’t thought of it but it makes perfect sense (or really, nonsense). And true IMO that the award may reflect a release from Bush-era trauma, but I would say that though many nations saw Obama’s election in a favorable light, I still feel it’s a bit eurocentric to believe everyone greeted him with total enthusiasm! (Yet I’m once in a while surprised when I read about a bad reaction to Obama in some far flung place–my thought is always, can’t you see what an improvement that is?!)
LikeLike
moon “bomb” is not correct.
there were no explosives.
It does disservice to NASA.
Chiron trine does imply a wounding
yet, NASA is an organization of peace
nonetheless. I think the cosmos can take a little probing, my goodness
sakes…
I was traumatized as I believed
untrue reports of explosives on the
centaur craft.
I frankly think NASA is owed an apology by anyone accusing them of using a “bomb”, wouldn’t you agree?
No, I don’t. If NASA targeted my house with a rocket and another ‘vehicle’ planned to meet and crash in precisely the same spot, and I, not being home at the time of the event, say “NASA bombed my house,” would you still be telling me how inaccurate my description is? A bomb can be anything targeted at anything else (typically dropped upon it), not necessarily explosive–so NASA will just have to settle for only your apology, william!
LikeLike
oh yeah, those sensational journalists at national geographic shld apologize to NASA stat http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/10/091009-nasa-moon-bombing-lcross-impact-crash-2.html there were rockets. they were launched. deeper craters were made. i’m usually a huge fan of NASA and exploration in general (i was also proud to tweet abt Obama’s appt. of it’s first Af-Am director) but vaporized (televised) astronauts aside, NASA doesn’t have the soundest batting average. Had they found water, would it have been the U.S.’s to ration? Since this was no multi-national mission. This was nuts. No two ways about it. As for the consequences, one need only look at the Red Storm in Australia http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/10/07/dust-storms-boom.html to be reminded that ‘butterfly flaps it’s wings in the rain forest in brazil and the effects are felt on a flower in China’
LikeLike
and as for astrology, poor cancers.
To have one’s symbol assaulted . . . I hadn’t thought of that! Thanks for your comments, dream!
LikeLike
I like that you connected all three events together. I hadn’t thought to do that astrologically until after reading this post. See my comments to you on Twitter 🙂
I agree with William about the subjective parts of the post: the use of the term “bomb” to describe this moon mission. We didn’t “bomb” the moon. We’re exploring it. There’s a *huge* difference.
Also, I’m uncomfortable with the assumption that President Obama has yet to “earn” his Nobel Peace Prize. If you take his entire life into consideration, his every action during his professional career has been towards that of service (Leo Sun in the 6th house) and bringing peace. This wasn’t simply a popularity contest award. And to imply that also implies an affirmative action award of sorts…especially considering you added him being an African-American president, as if that has something to do with his honor.
The reason given for honoring him is his ability to bring about a peaceful environment internationally: not because he’s black but because of his foreign policy of DIPLOMACY rather than WARMONGERING of our previous president. Frankly, I think this was a “atta boy!” from Europe to encourage us to keep up the good work. As in: we want you to know, America, that it was a good idea to elect this man…and if you don’t want him, we will take him off your hands as our leader.
Transit Jupiter in Aquarius at 17 degrees is almost exactly conjunct Pres. Obama’s Aquarius Ascendant at 18 degrees. I interpret this to mean that his image is getting worldwide approval for transcending cultural, racial, political differences.
Keep up the good posts! You make me think. 🙂
Hi jazzz! Just a couple of rebuttals 🙂 I just can’t consider what NASA did “exploring”–sorry. I always assume that exploring doesn’t harm or invade the object–just a little ‘pet peeve’ of mine! I mentioned Obama’s African-American heritage only in terms of his election to President, meaning to imply that it was an especially impressive and difficult feat to attain such office in this country for anyone who’s not a white male. And everyone has to “earn” their Nobel prize–that’s the point of it! I have no doubt that he will accumulate the kind of significant works that bring about this award–what made me uncomfortable was the fact that there was a rush to award it on the basis of others’ hopes not on accomplishment (and I’m not discounting his impact, but as I noted previously, it would be naive to believe that everyone sees his influence in the same way). IMO you both misread my intention (I do not think it was an “affirmative action” award!) and that you misunderstand the nature of the Nobel–it’s not meant to be an “atta boy” award, but one based on specifics–I agree that he’s changed the international climate in major ways for the better, and ushered in a new era–no question–but my point was that in giving this award before he has a chance to really show what he can do, he in some ways suffers (under others’ expectations, under the things a Peace prize winner is expected or not to do, and so on). I in no way have a quarrel with the award, only find the timing unfortunate. Thanks for making me think, jazz!
LikeLike
Oh yeah..one more thing. I also find it interesting that Pres. Obama has Chiron in Pisces in the 1st house natally and transit Chiron in Aquarius is in his 1st house (some see HIM as the cause of their wounding, while others see him as the catalyst for their healing).
His natal Chiron is in a Grand Trine with Venus in Cancer (5th house) and Neptune in Scorpio (9th house). This could also be the reason why he’s so loved/appreciated (5th house) internationally (9th house). His chart shows that he’s an excellent international representative for America.
On the flip side, his natal Chiron in Pisces squares his natal Moon in Gemini in the 4th house. So that could explain Americans’ conflicted feelings about him. He makes some feel very insecure and they question his patriotism and birth roots (4th house) because he seems to be so logical, rational and detached when speaking of America (Gemini), even though his words are clearly patriotic in his speeches. Personally, I can relate to his ability to be patriotic and critically objective about his home country at the same time.
Some have pointed to his humble acceptance speech as “awkward” as proof that even he doesn’t think he deserves the award. In general, I think his ego is fulfilled through practical service and getting public recognition (6th house Leo Sun), so he was happy about the award. However, he could also be uncomfortable with a public display of appreciation of his political talents (6th house Leo Sun squaring his 9th house Neptune in Scorpio).
Thanks for this analysis, very well done!
LikeLike
A clear sighted post, Julie. Thanks!
romanticism can lead us to over-value sex, magnetism, and one-and-only love while undervaluing companionship and a shared goal
This POV has much to recommend it IMO. Overblown romanticism (Neptune) can be very damaging in so many ways, leading to impossible expectations of perfection in relationships. Because we are bombarded with it constantly in music, film and those ubiquitous romance novels, it is difficult to hold on to the idea we are all HUMAN and fallible!!
However it keeps those of us who specialize in relationship astrology busy! 🙂
Thanks, Neith! Too true–we’d be out of business if Saturn was the favored lens!
LikeLike
I agree with Julie. A 2-ton rocket, sent with intention to create a crater, is a bomb.
Per NASA:
“The Centaur will act as a heavy impactor to create a debris plume that will rise above the lunar surface.”
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS/overview/index.html
“The Centaur upper stage and LCROSS spacecraft will not vaporize or disintegrate during impact, but will mostly crumple and break apart. Most of the material will be warmed to several hundred degrees just through the compaction process during impact. Any unspent rocket fuel (primarily hydrazine) will most likely “flash,” or burn, at impact. The bulk of the rocket material will stay within a crater diameter of the impact site (about 20 meters) so mess we make will be fairly confined to a very small area. It should be noted that there have been at least 20 impacts of terrestrial spacecraft into the moon.”
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS/FAQs/index.html
Thanks, April, for adding the particulars to the event–very helpful.
LikeLike
It is interesting the question comes up, how does human exploring wound the planets– it is an assault and an offense it would seem in any case.
I thought they were sending a 2 ton atomic bomb from the reports however and was beside myself, (as an intuitive well aware of spirit world)
But the reports were not true. And you need explosives to have a “bomb”… there were none.
So relieved no a-bomb, made me appreciate difference between peaceful and non-peaceful intent.
This was peaceful, (tho hurtful nonetheless)
Very interesting question is presented nonetheless– perhaps the question is being put to us-
how much is too much?
(prefer no violation at all, but where does that leave our science?)
hm, interesting problem…
A call for more respect perhaps, more awareness?
Moon trine chiron at time of impact clearly a message-
(still- it was not a “bomb”)
Sorry, william, I still think rocket fuel in a metal object hurtled toward a target is a bomb–it’s just a little quirk of mine to believe that! But you make an excellent distinction in pointing out that even with peaceful intent the action could be considered hurtful–and that, I think, is the point, bomb or not, that it seemed a rather violent thing to do.
LikeLike
I believe you are correct and it was registered as a violent event by cosmos… (chiron trine, and some other intuitive observations)
interesting.
I wonder why NASA doesn’t use actual explosives… peaceful they claim– ( or is it wisdom and healthy fear?) – my fear is perhaps one day they will use explosives… That scares me to death…
Couldn’t agree more–it is truly disturbing to think we may take our aggression and act it out in the rest of the solar system.
LikeLike
Sorry, william, I still think rocket fuel in a metal object hurtled toward a target is a bomb–it’s just a little quirk of mine to believe that!
1) The Centaur upper stage actually massed 5081 pounds (2 1/2 tons, a bit larger than a Ford F-350) and had about 300 pounds of fuel remaining when it impacted. The Centaur was the necessary to propel the LRO/LCROSS package to the moon at all. LRO is an observation satellite; LCROSS was a late bonus addition to LRO, and rode along on the outside of the Centaur. LCROSS was the object that followed the Centaur into the moon.
2) International cooperation: LRO actually did a joint radar scan of a lunar crater with the Indian Chandrayaan-1 lunar satellite. Interesting enough that separately launched satellite also had an impactor, which was used last year.
3) Fundamentally, a third stage is require on any standard chemical rocket to push a payload from earth orbit (LEO) to the moon. (Two stages of whatever size are required to push the third stage and the payload into orbit, which is why earth orbiting satelites are generally rising two-stage rockets into orbit. If a given third stage has enough pookie to push a payload to lunar orbit, then it too is going to the moon, along with the payload, either separately or package together. (But if a payload and a third stage go together attitude adjuments rockets need enough fuel to push both around, which is why the third stage tends to be ditched.) That’s why the third stages of Apollo 6-11 had just enough fuel to push them into solar orbit. The third stage of Apollo 12 missed its slingshot orbit and returned to earth orbit in 2003 as ‘asteroid’ J002E3. Roughly speaking, a third stage of a rocket to the moon is going to eventually land somewhere. Since Apollo 11 & 12 has sited seisometers on the moon, starting with Apollo 13, the 3rd stages of the remaining Apollo missions were piled into the moon to calibrate the seisometers and to help study the internal structure of the moon. This has been done a number of times before.
4) The earth is constantly bombarded by meteorites and micrometeorites. That’s why we have shooting stars, which are rocks, traveling at very high speeds. Since the moon is in the same orbit around the sun as the earth, it too gets bombarded (daily) by micrometeorites. The aforementioned seismographs gave an estimate of 70-150 impacts per year ranging in size from four ounces on up to 2200 hundred points (i.e. a metric ton per impact). Lowballing the estimate, I figure 100 pounds per average impact times 100 impacts gives me about 10,000 pounds worth of impacts per year average, not including small objects like sand and dust. Sand and dust almost certainly totals up to a much larger amount of impact mass per year. So the 5,000 pounds of sheet metal meteorite might have increased the total amount of material pounding the moon this year by as much as 50%, but likely less than that. If there are an above average number of exciting impacts this year, likely it will be a much lower percentage than that.
5) There are other ways to shift 350 tons of sand and dust on the surface of the moon to discover what the geology is like, but it likely would involve a coupla of guys in spacesuits and many tons (possibly hundreds of tons) of drilling equipment. If anyone would prefer that so much to an impactor that they’re willing to pay for it, I’m game. As is, NASA basically made lemonade out of lemons.
6) A long time ago, in a solar system nearby (in fact, right here!), there were two planets (well, proto-planets), Terra and Thera. Those two formed in the same orbit, and as a consequence, the larger of the two won out in a contest of gravity. So Thera slammed into Terra.
Now that was painful. So painful that Thera disintegrated into lots of small pieces, and the (probably still molten) surface of Terra was completely repaved from end to end. The leftover bits of Thera formed a ring of rocks around Terra, and after a long interval (of healing?) eventually Thera got its act together and coalesced into the lady know known as Luna. Luna was then pounded pretty relentlessly for several hundred million years, and the new surface was repaved again, before things settled down to the small number of impacts Luna experiences now. (So Luna contains big chunks of the earth – and vice versa.)
7) Besides all the rocks and dust pounding the airless, waterless and organic lifeless Luna, it is also relentless pounded by and excess of hard radiation, as is the earth. Unlike the earth, Luna has no buffer, and if you experienced a similar amount of radiation down here, it would kill you deader than hell in a few months, at most.
8) That lifeless, waterless, airless surface amounts to a surface area the size of Africa, wrapped around a mass of rock equal to about 1.23% of the earth’s mass. The surafce is so thouroughly covered with impact craters that every new impact partly erases many old craters. So most of the nice normal looking craters on the moon have been made recently in terms of the age of the solar system, covering over the old craters. So. If you unloaded all the thermonuclear weapons in all the arsenals of the earth (roughly 50,000 bombs), all at once, there would be an extremely exciting light show, and the moon would have 50,000 brand new small dents. The rest of the universe, all of the solar system, and half the earth would never notice. It would be a lot like nuking the Sahara, or the Pacific ocean, but without the nasty side effects that detonating a nuclear weapon in an atmosphere entails.
If they did this on the far side of the moon, not only would the rest of the universe not even notice, nobody on earth would either. The seismographs on the moon would notice, except the last one stopped functioning due to extreme old age back in 1977.
9) Astrologically, I’ve noticed that a large number of women (it has been almost entirely women leading the charge) have been grossly offended by this and have gotten up on the Internet (made of a lot of metal clawed right out of the earth herself) to rail agin this uh, travesty. I suppose the moon squaring Uranus and Venus (and by carrying the light) Saturn and the Sun while trining the Sun and Neptune and Chiron and *Jupiter*, I’m guessing that it means it didn’t hurt much or at all. But there was a lot of squawking about it.
10) This is silly. The words that come to mind are lunacy, hysteria and bedlam.
max
[‘”At Bedlam, yonder, I’ve heard men proclaim they ruled the Eagles; vow they’d war upon the stars if I’d but give them a bottle of claret.”‘]
p.s. This probably has HTML and spelling errors; no preview. Sorry.
LikeLike
max–
Though I welcome open discussion, your lengthy commentary seems overkill to make a point on an astrology site, an attempt to ‘educate’ and put the rest of us ‘in our places’ by preening; as well, your need to denigrate women in their reaction to the astrological significance of this event shows not only a gross misunderstanding of the symbolic meaning of the Moon, but a (ready to be judged?) judgmentalism, intolerance, and desperate need to elevate your own ego by disparaging others that is not in keeping with the spirit of this blog. You not only miss the point of discussing the Moon impact in the first place, the astrology you do cite does not support your flabby assertion. Considering the way you feel, there should be no reason for you to return–all further commentary by you will be deleted–self-serving trolls are just not welcome.
Julie Demboski
LikeLike
Sorry to hijack this thread, but I want to ask you something. In the snippet below, a financial analyst which uses astrology says that July 2010 will be particularly bad.
What do you think? Is that date (July 26) really the worst in the last 200 years? Searching for it on the net does not return anything particularly bad.
I am not an astrology knowledgeable person, so please offer some layman perspective if possible.
Thanks and sorry again
Hi Gigi,
Why don’t you ask the person who posted the piece you cite? (Removed site address) If you really want to know about the financial future according to astrology, you need to consult an astrologer working in this field. And if you want forum administrators to take your posts seriously, you might want to use a web email address that isn’t so suggestive of this being spam.
jd
LikeLike
That was a honest question.
The snippet was from an article in a well known paper. I won’t mention it so you won’t take this message also as spam.
Both addresses I posted were from free hosting sites (one for images, the other for online storage).
As for the email, I didn’t use my real one since I’m tired of getting spam each time I post something somewhere.
All I wanted to know was if that planetary alignment is really all that special in a secular kind of way.
Have a nice day.
Hi Gigi,
Sorry, but I’m sure you can imagine how much spam I get in a day. My advice still stands: hire someone, or find an astrology forum or board where they are taking questions. Good luck.
jd
LikeLike
Hi (again) Julie,
Thanks for the replies.
Hi jazzz! Just a couple of rebuttals 🙂 I just can’t consider what NASA did “exploring”–sorry. I always assume that exploring doesn’t harm or invade the object–just a little ‘pet peeve’ of mine!
Understood. It’s a subject that many will have to agree to disagree on.
I mentioned Obama’s African-American heritage only in terms of his election to President, meaning to imply that it was an especially impressive and difficult feat to attain such office in this country for anyone who’s not a white male.
Ok. I find it more impressive that he won as an extremely qualified person in a country that is usually intimidated by people like that – even more than his racial background. I find it unfortunate that most Americans (even those that voted/support him) do not know the full extent of President Obama’s qualifications. If they did, they’d see why this award is fitting *now*.
And everyone has to “earn” their Nobel prize–that’s the point of it! I have no doubt that he will accumulate the kind of significant works that bring about this award–what made me uncomfortable was the fact that there was a rush to award it on the basis of others’ hopes not on accomplishment (and I’m not discounting his impact, but as I noted previously, it would be naive to believe that everyone sees his influence in the same way). IMO you both misread my intention (I do not think it was an “affirmative action” award!) and that you misunderstand the nature of the Nobel–it’s not meant to be an “atta boy” award, but one based on specifics…
He has “earned” his Nobel Peace Prize. The point of the award is to reward people who are workING towards peace. Peace is one of those things that will NEVER be fully accomplished, so to wait until AFTER peace is accomplished to recognize someone’s efforts is ridiculous. That’s why so many past winners have been rewarded BEFORE the results of their efforts have been yielded.
When I wrote “atta boy”, I was oversimplifying for the sake of humor. I have a very clear understanding of the criteria for being nominated for – and winning – the Nobel Peace Prize (I have read the bylaws and reviewed the history of past winners). The NPP isn’t a Grammy or an Oscar. It’s not just about rewarding “achievements”. It’s also about rewarding “potential” and “efforts”, the very thing you already give President Obama credit for doing. In this case, his *efforts* is an achievement, especially considering the path America WAS on before we elected Pres. Obama. << that's what I meant by "atta boy".
Rachel Maddow says it better here:
I in no way have a quarrel with the award, only find the timing unfortunate.
I find the timing of the award to be very fortunate and…timely.
Thanks for making me think, jazz!
Cool!
LikeLike
You’re back in a big way, thanks for your insight, Julie!
Thank you, katia!
LikeLike
Obama Nobel Price the day when the States wage war against the Moon…that reveals a lot, indeed!
Mainly how mad we have collectively become since it cost 79 million dollars when so many humans on Earth have no access to water.
One of the best efforts to provide this much needed resource http://www.charitywater.org/
LikeLike
Have come to respect your position on many fronts & surf over as often as possible to recharge. Kudos for a job well done, Julie. Keep up the good work! I Love your MOXIE/MOJO. 🙂
Um, oh yeah. Reason for posting,…
Planet Waves has an article that supports your view of “BOMBING” the Moon: http://planetwaves.net/pagetwo/2009/10/12/bombing-the-moon-enough/
Toodles
/(*_*)\
Thank you very much, Annie!
LikeLike